Choose Matillion if you want a visual pipeline building and need multi-cloud warehouse support without code.
Choose AWS Glue when you’re committed to AWS infrastructure and have developers comfortable with Spark and Python.
Go with Hevo for a no-code, fully automated platform that delivers enterprise efficiency and auto-scaling at an affordable cost.
At some point in your data integration journey, you might have faced the Matillion vs AWS Glue debate. It could be for cleaner transformations, more scalable infrastructure, or simply to explore affordable options.
Matillion provides a visual, warehouse-centric way to build no-code pipelines, and AWS Glue offers a code-first, Spark-powered engine that fits naturally inside the AWS ecosystem. Both support reliable pipelines, but which one is for you?
This guide looks at the differences that matter in real operations. We’ll compare their features, use cases, pricing, and more to help you decide which data integration tool makes sense for your stack.
Table of Contents
What Is Matillion?
G2 rating: 4.4 (81)
Garter Rating: 4.4 (174)
Matillion is a cloud-native platform that makes data integration accessible through its visual interface while still offering code-based options for developers. It provides 150+ pre-built integrations with major platforms like Snowflake, Amazon Redshift, Google BigQuery, and Databricks.
The platform pushes transformations down to your data warehouse, so your data never leaves the cloud during processing. This ensures faster performance through your warehouse’s computing power. It is a good fit for teams that want warehouse-focused ETL without heavy infrastructure management.
Key features of Matillion
- Orchestration control: Manages scheduling, dependencies, and event-driven workflows to run complex pipelines without extra tools.
- AI pipeline assistant: Helps you create pipelines and manage routine tasks using natural-language commands through Maia, a virtual data engineer.
- Version control: Lets you track changes, manage versions, and collaborate with your team using familiar DevOps workflows.
- Data security: Secures sensitive data through masking, encryption, and tokenization while integrating with third-party tools, like ALTR, for advanced access control.
- Environment flexibility: Configures pipelines across Development, Test, and Production environments automatically using dynamic variables for minimal errors.
Use cases
- Modernize ETL systems: Replace traditional on-premise ETL tools with cloud-based pipelines that run directly in your warehouse without rewrites.
- Boost BI reporting: Power dashboards in Looker, Tableau, or Power BI by creating fast, reliable transformation workflows.
- Support multi-cloud stacks: Standardize ELT pipeline design across teams that manage multiple cloud data warehouses.
Pricing
Matillion provides a usage-based pricing model.
- Developer: Unlimited projects and Git version control for one user.
- Teams: Adds audit logs and standard support for up to five users.
- Scale: Includes advanced features like security, hybrid deployment, and data lineage tracking for up to five users.
The 14-day free trial allows 500 credits.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Supports both batch and CDC-based replication.
- Drag-and-drop debugging simplifies troubleshooting complex logic.
- Logs pipeline job history clearly for easy auditability.
Cons:
- Git integration stores JSON files, which can make conflict resolution challenging for some workflows.
- Advanced features often require core SQL expertise.
- Scalability is tied to warehouse cost, which creates budget surprises.
What Is AWS Glue?
G2 Rating: 4.3 (194)
Gartner Rating: 4.3 (496)
AWS Glue is a fully managed, serverless data integration service from Amazon Web Services (AWS). It helps you discover, prepare, and integrate data across multiple sources for analytics, machine learning, and application development.
The platform is suitable for AWS users due to its deep integration with the platform. It integrates easily with services like Amazon S3, Amazon Redshift, and Amazon Athena. Additionally, it offers 70+ third-party connectors through the AWS Marketplace. This greatly reduces setup complexity and ongoing maintenance effort for data teams.
Key features of AWS Glue
- Central data catalog: Provides a central, persistent, and Hive-compatible metadata repository and serves as the single source of truth for all AWS analytics services.
- Automatic PySpark code: Generates production-ready Python or Scala scripts automatically, based on your actions in the visual editor for easier AWS Glue ETL development.
- Job bookmarking: Keeps track of previously processed data to ensure incremental loads run efficiently without reprocessing old files.
- Native Apache Iceberg integration: Enables advanced analytics with features like time travel, schema evolution, and partitioning for large-scale datasets.
- ML data transforms: Uses machine learning-driven functions such as FindMatches to handle deduplication and record linkage, even with imperfect data.
Use cases
- Power data lakes: Transform and catalog raw S3 data into structured formats ready for querying and machine learning.
- Enable real-time analytics: Ingest streaming data from Kinesis or Kafka, transform it, and make it immediately available to BI.
- Support compliance reporting: Prepare and standardize data across multiple systems to generate regulatory or audit-ready reports efficiently.
Pricing
AWS Glue offers a resource consumption-based model.
- ETL jobs and interactive sessions: Billed per Data Processing Unit (DPU) at $0.44 per DPU-hour, charged by the second with a 1-minute minimum.
- Data Catalog: First million metadata objects and access requests each month are free. Beyond that, objects cost $1.00 per 100,000, and requests $1.00 per million.
- Crawlers: Charged $0.44 per DPU-hour with a minimum 10-minute billing per run.
- Data Brew: Interactive sessions cost $1.00 per 30 minutes; job execution runs $0.48 per node-hour.
- Data Quality: Charges $0.44 per DPU-hour for recommendations, evaluations, anomaly detection, and model retraining.
- Zero-ETL: No base fee, data ingestion compute is $1.50 per GB.
Pricing varies by region, and AWS offers a free trial for select Glue services.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Development Endpoints allow advanced, interactive code testing.
- Detailed lineage maps simplify compliance reporting.
- Multi-environment support prevents production disruptions.
Cons:
- Steep learning curve for teams without Python or Spark experience.
- Limited connector support for non-AWS data sources.
- The UI is less intuitive than no-code AWS Glue alternatives.
Matillion vs AWS Glue vs Hevo: A Detailed Comparison Table
| Core functions | Fully managed, no-code ELT/ETL | ETL/ELT data orchestration | Serverless ETL service |
| Ease of use | Easy | Easy | Complex |
| Connectors | 150+ | 150+ | 70+ third-party |
| Real-time sync | |||
| Deployment | Cloud SaaS | Cloud-native | Serverless, AWS cloud |
| Transformations | Simple GUI, Python, and SQL | Visual, Python, and SQL | Advanced Spark ETL |
| Warehouse support | Multi-warehouse support | Multi-warehouse support | AWS-focused through Data Catalog |
| AI functionalities | Supports AI-ready pipelines | Maia AI assistant | Amazon Q Developer |
| Vendor lock-in | Low | Low | High |
| Customer support | 24/7 chat, email | Tier-based, paid support plans | Paid plans |
| Security compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA, DORA, and CPRA | SOC 2, ISO 27001, and PCI DSS | ISO, SOC, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and more |
| Free plan | (limited to Data Catalog) | ||
| Free trial | |||
| Starting price | $239/month | Custom pricing | $0.44 per DPU-hour |
AWS Glue vs Matillion: In-Depth Feature & Use Case Comparison
1. Set up complexity
Matillion offers a polished drag-and-drop canvas to build pipelines. The platform uses familiar workflow patterns that make sense even if you haven’t built ETL pipelines before. Teams can onboard new members quickly since the visual representation shows exactly what the pipeline does at each step.
While AWS Glue Studio provides a UI-based builder, most teams end up writing PySpark or Scala code for anything beyond basic transformations. The visual editor works well for simple jobs but becomes limiting for complex logic. Even with detailed AWS Glue tutorials available, your team needs Python or Spark expertise to use the platform effectively.
If you have a mixed team of technical and non-technical members, Matillion is a suitable option. However, AWS Glue is ideal for a team of developers, especially when managing workflows in the AWS ecosystem.
Matillion:
AWS Glue:
2. Connector coverage
Matillion provides a wide set of fully managed SaaS connectors that you configure through the UI. It also hosts the Flex Connector library that includes a set of pre-built templates of commonly used APIs to build custom connectors. You can also request a connector, and the team will create it for you.
AWS Glue performs well when your data sources stay within AWS. Once you move to external SaaS tools, you often have to script custom code or rely on Marketplace integrations, which can increase maintenance overhead.
Matillion wins for a variety of ready-to-use SaaS connectors, while AWS Glue provides better support if your data sources live mostly inside AWS.
Matillion:
AWS Glue:
3. Transformation capabilities
Matillion offers visual components for most transformation steps and lets you use SQL or Python when you want more control inside the warehouse. This helps mixed-skill teams because analysts and engineers can work on the same pipelines without slowing each other down.
AWS Glue follows a code-first approach for transformations and has minimal UI support. If your team is proficient with PySpark, you can create powerful transformations and claim deep control over large-scale ETL.
Hence, AWS Glue leads for heavy Spark workloads and highly customized data preparation, while Matillion is better suited for teams that prioritize speed and simplicity.
Matillion:
AWS Glue:
4. Performance and scalability
Matillion primarily delivers high-performance batch processing. While it supports CDC for some sources, true real-time streaming isn’t the platform’s primary design focus. Performance is tied directly to the data warehouse’s resources, which means if you scale up a warehouse like Redshift, Matillion performs faster.
AWS Glue features dedicated streaming ETL jobs that process data from Kinesis or Kafka. The platform handles both batch and real-time workloads with similar development patterns. Its serverless AWS Glue architecture features auto-scaling, allowing it to efficiently process huge volumes of files, logs, or Spark jobs. However, costs can spike quickly if DPU allocation is misconfigured.
So, Glue is more future-proof for AWS-first engineering teams running both batch and streaming workloads as long as vendor lock-in is not a problem.
AWS Glue:
5. Cost management
Both tools have unpredictable pricing models, but in different ways.
Matillion offers credits based on Task Hours consumed by your pipelines. You can track usage through detailed dashboards, and pricing scales with actual usage. If you run out of credits, you must buy additional ones. This can lead to budget unpredictability if instances run inefficiently.
AWS Glue bills per DPU-hour with per-second billing. While this sounds flexible, unexpected costs can surprise you when jobs run longer or use more DPUs than planned. Optimizing AWS Glue jobs to control spending requires specialized knowledge of Spark performance tuning.
The right choice depends entirely on your data frequency and job use cases. Analyze your workload patterns before committing to either model.
Matillion:
When to Choose Matillion
You should choose Matillion when your priority is speed of pipeline construction, and you rely on non-developer personnel like analysts to build and maintain data flows. Its low-code ELT approach and broad cloud connectivity make it a fit for multi-cloud environments and teams that prefer SQL-driven transformations.
If quick time-to-value and tight warehouse integration matter most, Matillion is ideal. However, if you require features like real-time streaming or hybrid deployments, consider exploring Matillion alternatives.
When to Choose AWS Glue
AWS Glue is a practical choice if most of your data lives in AWS tools like S3, Redshift, or DynamoDB. It proves useful when you need highly customized, large-scale ETL jobs in Python or Scala, and want serverless elasticity for unpredictable workloads.
You can also lean into advanced AWS Glue features, like its Data Catalog and native streaming, when your roadmap includes continuous ingestion or ML-driven transformations. Pick Glue only if you have developers comfortable with Spark to avoid cost and complexity issues.
Why Does Hevo Stand Out?
Hevo Data provides a simple, reliable, and transparent alternative to conventional ETL platforms. You do not need to manage credits, tune DPUs, or write transformation code unless you choose to. Hevo automates extraction, loading, scaling, and monitoring with minimal configuration and complete visibility end-to-end.
This is why Hevo stands out:
- No-code ETL: Sets up your pipeline within minutes without coding.
- Battle-tested connectors: Offers 150+ pre-built connectors, plus custom ones through code or on request.
- Flexible processing: Supports both batch and real-time sync for smooth data movement.
- Auto-scalability: Scales workloads in the background to stabilize pipelines as data volume grows.
- Advanced transformation: Manages transformations using the GUI or SQL, Python, and dbt for custom logic.
- Affordable pricing: Starts at just $239/ month and provides a generous free-forever tier.
- 24/7 human support: A dedicated support team helps you create, launch, and scale pipelines throughout.
If you want simple pipelines that can still handle complexity at scale, Hevo is the best option.
Ready to explore Hevo? Book a free demo with an expert today!
FAQs
Q1. Which tool provides better coverage for SaaS application connectors, Matillion or AWS Glue?
Matillion includes 150+ pre-built connectors covering popular SaaS applications like Salesforce, HubSpot, and Google Analytics. AWS Glue has limited SaaS connectors and requires custom Python scripts for most third-party applications. If you need out-of-the-box SaaS connectivity, Matillion provides significantly better coverage.
Q2. Which tool handles variable data volumes more cost-effectively?
AWS Glue’s pay-per-DPU serverless model is generally more cost-efficient for unpredictable or bursty workloads because you only pay when jobs run. Matillion’s credit consumption can become expensive during sudden high-volume spikes. However, inefficient Glue job configurations can also drive up costs, so tuning is essential.
Q3. Can you build pipelines in AWS Glue without writing code?
Yes, to an extent. AWS Glue Studio provides a visual interface for basic ETL jobs. However, complex transformations, custom business logic, and most data quality checks require PySpark or Scala code.
Q4. What are the best alternatives to Matillion and AWS Glue?
Hevo is a strong alternative if you need fully automated, no-code pipelines with auto-scaling and built-in schema handling. Fivetran is ideal if you only need automated EL without complex transformations. Tools like Databricks or Airflow suit teams wanting more control over custom ETL or orchestration.