Two heavyweights stand apart, each one suited differently toward the management and analysis of a large volume of data—Amazon Redshift, in the case of AWS cloud-based data warehouse to run complex analytics and for business intelligence; and then, of course, comes the Apache Cassandra, aimed directly at specific needs within businesses. Apache Cassandra is a NoSQL database that provides very high-performance distribution and has gained good fame for handling big volumes of data at blazing speed, which in turn makes it ideal for applications requiring access to real-time data at fault tolerance across distributed networks.
But which one fits your needs? Whether you run massive analytical queries or monitor fast-moving data worldwide, knowing the Redshift VS Cassandra differences is vital. This blog unpacks everything from their architectures to their unique strengths, practical use cases, and limitations so you get a complete view and can make a well-informed choice.
What is Amazon Redshift?
AWS Redshift is a fully-managed data warehousing solution from Amazon Web Services that allows analysts to manage data sets on a large scale and query in seconds. It involves no upfront costs, setup, and maintenance.
Most businesses prefer Redshift over traditional data warehouse solutions due to its compliance features, quick performance, and scalable data processing solutions. Also, it offers various data analytics tools and machine learning applications.
You can analyze all your collected data with the help of various business intelligence tools available in the Redshift. It is a cloud-based suite of data management and analytics tools that helps businesses store all data and provide insights for better decision-making.
With AWS Redshift, companies have to no longer invest in time, money, and expertise as it offers a complete infrastructure to help optimize operations, maintain efficiency, and generate revenue.
Key Features of Amazon Redshift
Fault tolerance: Unlike other data warehouse solutions, Redshift ensures the continuous and smooth functioning of nodes at all times. If any single component fails or the clusters go offline, the data warehouse automatically creates copies of data to the other nodes. Thus, it offers continuous operations.
End-to-end data encryption: Encryption in Amazon Redshift is an optional setting but a great feature to protect your sensitive data. Using this highly customizable end-to-end data encryption feature, Redshift helps maintain the complete privacy of your data. Also, users have full access to configure and employ a customer or AWS-managed key to modify an unencrypted cluster.
Column-oriented databases: This feature enables organizations to store data into rows or columns for increased speed. With the help of column-oriented databases, the solution performs massive data processing jobs faster.
Massively parallel processing (MPP): This feature allows users to divide large data sets into small tasks and distribute them to various computer nodes for quick analysis. All the nodes perform computations at the same time and deliver fast query performance.
With Hevo’s wide variety of connectors and blazing-fast data pipelines, you can extract & load data from 150+ Data Sources straight into your data warehouse, like Redshift, BigQuery, Snowflake, and many more. Know why Hevo is the Best:
- Cost-Effective Pricing: Transparent pricing with no hidden fees, helping you budget effectively while scaling your data integration needs.
- Minimal Learning Curve: Hevo’s simple, interactive UI makes it easy for new users to get started and perform operations.
- Schema Management: Hevo eliminates the tedious task of schema management by automatically detecting and mapping incoming data to the destination schema.
Get Started with Hevo for Free
What is Cassandra?
Apache Cassandra is a secure, open-source distributed database management system designed to store and manage large volumes of data across various servers and data centers. It is a type of NoSQL database with peer-to-peer architecture and advanced features.
The popular distributed database is fault-tolerant, delivers zero downtime, offers linear scalability, and handles big data workloads with no single point of failure.
Key Features of Cassandra
Highly Scalable: Users can easily add more hardware to the system. As a result, you can store more data and customers as per the requirement.
Security: It supports an audit logging feature that aids companies in monitoring all DML, DDL, and DCL activities and conducting real-time operational analysis without impacting workload performance. With proper analysis, users can easily track suspicious events or threats.
Quick Response Time: Users have full access to add more nodes to the cluster without worrying about the complexities. Thus, the throughput increases, which results in a quick response time.
Fault-Tolerant: In Cassandra, each node plays the same role and carries similar information. Thus, if any node fails, the other node will replace it and continue performing tasks. Also, Cassandra is highly scalable, which means extra nodes can be added to the system. Thus, the database system ensures high performance with no single point of failure. Learn more about the Cassandra Data Models.
Redshift vs Cassandra: Key differences
Both Redshift and Cassandra are used to manage large volumes of data and are fault-tolerant, but have certain differences that make them different from one another. Here are a few comparisons of Redshift vs Cassandra:
Redshift vs Cassandra: Database Model
AWS Redshift is a data warehouse solution that uses business intelligence tools to store and manage large data sets. Apache Cassandra is a distributed database system that store large data volumes across different data centers.
Redshift vs Cassandra: Description
Most businesses opt for Redshift or Cassandra when it comes to storing or analyzing big data. Amazon Redshift is a large-scale data warehouse service that can be used with business intelligence tools, while Cassandra is a wide-column store based on ideas of BigTable and DynamoDB info.
Redshift vs Cassandra: Architecture
Redshift has a massively parallel processing (MPP) architecture, while Cassandra has a peer-to-peer architecture. In the Massive Parallel Processing architecture, developers have full access to add more compute resources as per the project requirement. Redshift follows the “divide and distribute” approach, which enables the fast execution of complex queries in Redshift.
In the peer-to-peer architecture, each node comprises similar capabilities and responsibilities. Thus, when a node fails, the other replaces it and serves the purpose.
Easily Integrate your Data to Redshift for Free
No credit card required
Cassandra was designed for fast writing and read records based on keys, whereas, Redshift was designed for fast aggregations (MPP). Redshift comprises various features, including Query optimizer, Data compression, Result caching, etc that result in fast execution of queries.
Redshift vs Cassandra: License
Cassandra is a NoSQL distributed database known for its scalability and high availability. It has an open-source license, while Redshift is a data warehousing solution known for scalable data processing solutions and fast performance. Redshift supports a commercial license.
Redshift vs Cassandra: Operating System Support
Redshift has a hosted server operating system, and Cassandra supports BSD, Linux, OS X, Windows, etc.
Redshift vs Cassandra: Language Compatibility
Redshift is compatible with all languages compatible with JDBC/ODBC. On the other hand, Cassandra supports Javascript, C++, C#, Go, PHP, Python, etc.
Redshift vs Cassandra: Foreign Key
A foreign key is a single column or group of columns in a relational database table that must match the values of the primary key of another table. Thus, establishing a link between them. Redshift supports foreign keys to create a few more efficient query plans, while Cassandra supports no such keys.
Redshift vs Cassandra: Company Who Uses
Starbucks, Facebook, Rackspace, etc., are a few high-profile companies that prefer Cassandra, whereas Nubank, Bitpanda, Coursera, Lyft, etc., use Amazon Redshift.
Redshift vs Cassandra: Use Cases
Amazon Redshift is used by companies that prefer business intelligence tools to build powerful reports and deploy applications faster. It is a cost-effective solution that helps run queries on semi-structured and structured data.
Most Mobile phone companies, messaging service providers, and retailers use Cassandra as they store data at a large scale. Also, the applications that receive data at high speed prefer Cassandra. It is also a great option for social media providers and cloud-based companies that manage large data sets for analysis and recommendations.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Amazon Redshift | Apache Cassandra |
| Database Model | Data warehouse solution using business intelligence tools to store and manage large data sets. | Distributed NoSQL database for storing large volumes across multiple data centers. |
| Description | Large-scale data warehouse service ideal for storing and analyzing big data. | A wide-column store based on BigTable and DynamoDB principles is designed for high-velocity data storage and access. |
| Architecture |
Massively parallel processing (MPP) architecture allows scalable computing resources and fast query execution. | Peer-to-peer architecture, where each node has equal capabilities, ensures fault tolerance and high availability. |
| Performance | Optimized for fast aggregations with features like query optimizer, data compression, and result caching. | Optimized for quick read and write operations using keys, ideal for high-speed data access and distributed storage. |
| License | Commercial License | Open-source License |
| Operating System Support | Hosted server operating system managed by AWS. | Supports BSD, Linux, OS X, Windows, etc. |
| Language Compatibility | Compatible with all languages supporting JDBC/ODBC. | Supports multiple languages like Java, C++, C#, Go, PHP, Python, etc. |
| Foreign Key Support | Supports foreign keys for efficient query planning in relational setups. | Does not support foreign keys. |
| Companies Using | Used by companies like Nubank, Bitpanda, Coursera, and Lyft for data warehousing and analytics. | Preferred by companies like Starbucks, Facebook, and Rackspace for high-volume, high-speed data storage and access. |
| Use Cases |
Ideal for business intelligence, reporting, and fast querying on structured and semi-structured data. | Preferred for mobile, messaging, and social media applications needing fast, distributed data access and storage. |
Conclusion
Data Warehouse Solutions have become important for cloud-based businesses with big data. Go through some of the above-listed key differences between Amazon Redshift vs Cassandra to select the one suitable for your project requirements.
Redshift and Cassandra are the trusted destinations for companies to store their data, but transferring data from various sources into these data warehouse solutions is a hectic task. The automated data pipeline helps solve this issue, and this is where Hevo comes into the picture. Hevo Data is a No-code Data Pipeline and has awesome 150+ pre-built Integrations that you can choose from.
SIGN UP for a 14-day free trial and see the difference! Share your experience of learning about Amazon Redshift vs Cassandra in the comments section below.
FAQs
1. When should you not use Cassandra?
Avoid Cassandra for applications requiring complex transactions, such as banking, as it lacks support for joins, ACID transactions, and foreign keys. It’s best for fast, high-scale data retrieval rather than relational data structures.
2. Is Redshift good for OLAP?
Yes, Redshift is ideal for OLAP (Online Analytical Processing), offering fast query execution for large-scale data analysis and reporting tasks.
3. What are the drawbacks of the Cassandra database?
Cassandra lacks strong ACID compliance, foreign keys, and SQL-like joins, which can limit complex data relationships. Additionally, managing large clusters can be resource-intensive.
Veeresh is a skilled professional specializing in JDBC, REST API, Linux, and Shell Scripting. With a knack for resolving complex issues and implementing Python transformations, he plays a crucial role in enhancing Hevo's data integration solutions.
