Apache Kafka vs RabbitMQ: 12 Critical Differences

on Data Streaming, Kafka • January 31st, 2022 • Write for Hevo

kafka vs rabbitmq

It is essential for organizations to efficiently manage several applications that generate a colossal amount of data for building better products and services. Apache Kafka vs RabbitMQ with a common purpose are widely used Open-Source, Message-Handling Solutions that assist in communication in distributed environments. 

Today, both solutions help organizations streamline the movement of data in Real-Time for building Streaming Applications. Though, when deciding between Apache Kafka vs RabbitMQ, it all comes down to individual use cases, their architecture, and performance.

In this article, you will learn about the major differences between Apache Kafka vs RabbitMQ.

Table of Contents

What is Apache Kafka? 

Kafka vs RabbitMQ - Apache Kafka Logo
Image Source

Kafka was originally developed at LinkedIn to address their need for Monitoring Activity Stream Data and Operational Metrics such as CPU, I/O usage, and request timings. Subsequently, in early 2011, it was Open-Sourced through the Apache Software Foundation.

Apache Kafka is a Distributed Event Streaming Platform written in Java and Scala. It is a Publish-Subscribe (pub-sub) Messaging Solution used to create Real-Time Streaming Data Pipelines and applications that adapt to the Data Streams.

Kafka deals with Real-Time volumes of data and swiftly routes it to various consumers. It provides seamless integration between the information of producers and consumers without obstructing the producers and without revealing the identities of consumers to the producers. 

Key Features of Apache Kafka 

Apache Kafka provides the following features such as communicating through messaging and stream processing to enable real-time data storage and analysis.     

  • Persistent messaging: Any type of information loss cannot be tolerated in order to gain real value from big data. Apache Kafka is built with O(1) Disc Structures that deliver constant-time performance even with very high volumes of stored messages (in the TBs).
  • High Throughput: Kafka was designed to work with large amounts of data and support Millions of Messages per Second.
  • Distributed event streaming platform: Apache Kafka facilitates Message Partitioning across Kafka servers and distributing consumption over a cluster of consumer systems while ensuring per-partition ordering semantics.
  • Real-time solutions: Messages created by producer threads should be instantly available to consumer threads. This characteristic is essential in event-based systems like Complex Event Processing (CEP).

What is RabbitMQ?

Kafka vs RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ Logo
Image Source

RabbitMQ was initially developed as RabbitMQ Technologies in a partnership between LShift, LTD, and Cohesive FT. Currently, it is owned by Pivotal Software and released under the Mozilla Public License.

RabbitMQ is a widely-used Open-Source Message Broker and Queueing Platform implemented on Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) either written in Erlang or Open Telecom Platform (OTP) language.

It is also known as Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) because it provides advanced routing and message distribution features, even with WAN tolerances, to support reliable, distributed systems that easily interconnect with other systems.

Whether an application is hosted using the Cloud Platform or on users’ Data Centers, RabbitMQ provides tremendous flexibility, high scalability, high availability and can be implemented on various distributed platforms.

RabbitMQ is a Lightweight and Powerful platform for constructing Distributed Software Architectures ranging from the very simple to the highly complex.

Key Features of RabbitMQ

  • In-built Clustering: RabbitMQ’s clustering was designed with two purposes in mind. In case one node fails, it still allows the consumers and producers to keep functioning in the event and scaling messaging throughput linearly by adding additional nodes.
  • Flexible Routing: RabbitMQ offers several built-in exchange types for routing. For typical routing, messages are routed through exchanges even before arriving at queues. And, for complex routing, users can bind exchanges together or even write their exchange type as a plugin.
  • Reliability: Persistence, delivery feedback, publisher confirmations, and high availability are prominent features of RabbitMQ that directly impact performance.
  • Security: RabbitMQ provides security on various tiers. Enforcing SSL-only communication and Client Certificate Checking can help secure client connections. User access may be controlled at the virtual host, ensuring high-level isolation of messages.

Accelerate Apache Kafka ETL Using Hevo’s No-code Data Pipeline

Hevo Data, a No-code Data Pipeline, is your one-stop-shop solution for all your Apache Kafka ETL needs! Hevo offers a built-in and robust native integration with Apache Kafka and Kafka Confluent Cloud to help you replicate data in a matter of minutes! You can seamlessly load data from Apache Kafka straight to your Desired Database, Data Warehouse, or any other destination of your choice. With Hevo in place, you can not only replicate data from 100+ Data Sources (Including 40+ Free Sources) but also enrich & transform it into an analysis-ready form without having to write a single line of code! In addition, Hevo’s fault-tolerant architecture ensures that the data is handled securely and consistently with zero data loss.

Get Started with Hevo for Free

Check out what makes Hevo amazing:

  • Secure: Hevo has a fault-tolerant architecture that ensures that the data is handled in a secure, consistent manner with zero data loss.
  • Schema Management: Hevo takes away the tedious task of schema management & automatically detects schema of incoming data and maps it to the destination schema.
  • Connectors: Hevo supports 100+ Integrations to SaaS platforms such as WordPress, Apache Kafka, Confluent Cloud, FTP/SFTP, Files, Databases, BI tools, and Native REST API & Webhooks Connectors. It supports various destinations including Google BigQuery, Amazon Redshift, Snowflake, Firebolt, Data Warehouses; Amazon S3 Data Lakes; Databricks, MySQL, SQL Server, TokuDB, DynamoDB, PostgreSQL Databases to name a few.
  • Minimal Learning: Hevo with its simple and interactive UI, is extremely simple for new customers to work on and perform operations.
  • Hevo Is Built To Scale: As the number of sources and the volume of your data grows, Hevo scales horizontally, handling millions of records per minute with very little latency.
  • Incremental Data Load: Hevo allows the transfer of data that has been modified in real-time. This ensures efficient utilization of bandwidth on both ends.
  • Extensive Customer Base: Over 1000 Data-Driven organizations from 40+ Countries trust Hevo for their Data Integration needs.
  • Live Support: The Hevo team is available round the clock to extend exceptional support to its customers through chat, email, and support calls.
Sign up here for a 14-Day Free Trial!

What are the differences between Apache Kafka vs RabbitMQ? 12 Critical Aspects

Selecting between Apache Kafka vs RabbitMQ is a daunting task as both of them are widely used Open-Source Message-Handling Solutions. When deciding between Apache Kafka vs RabbitMQ, you can make an informed choice by going through the following aspects:

1) Apache Kafka vs RabbitMQ: Critical Use Cases 

Preference over Apache Kafka vs RabbitMQ can vary widely based on your individual use cases. Apache Kafka is an excellent choice for the following scenarios:

  • Real-time data processing: In the financial sector, it is critical to stop fraudulent transactions as soon as they occur. IoT devices are often useless without real-time data processing ability. Kafka can be helpful here since it can transmit data from producers to data handlers and then to data storage.
  • Website Activity Tracking: At LinkedIn, Apache Kafka is utilized to stream activity data and operational analytics. It enables offline and online data processing in Hadoop systems by offering a parallel load mechanism and the ability to partition in real-time.

    This implies that site activities like page views and searches are published to central topics per activity type. These feeds are available for subscription to a wide range of applications, including real-time processing, monitoring, and loading into Hadoop or offline data warehousing systems for processing and reporting.
  • Log Aggregation: Kafka is frequently used as a replacement for a log aggregation solution. Log aggregation gathers physical log files from servers and stores them in a central location for processing.

    Kafka abstracts away the contents of files and presents log or event data as a stream of messages, which is a cleaner abstraction. Lower latency processing and simpler support for numerous data sources and dispersed data consumption.

For a complete study of differences between Apache Kafka vs RabbitMQ, you can check out the following areas where using RabbitMQ can be advantageous:

  • Complex routing: RabbitMQ may be the ideal solution when messages are required to route across multiple consumer applications. Its consistent hash exchange can balance load processing across a distributed monitoring service. 
  • File Scanning: Users can submit files to the Softonic platform, screened for viruses, and information about the file gathered before being distributed to other users.

    A notification is received by the user as soon as the upload is complete. This is possible because of the Microservice Architecture Feature of RabbitMQ that allows the web servers to respond quickly to requests.
  • Image scaling: To effectively promote a home and capture a buyer’s interest, real estate brokers require numerous images. When a broker uploads a new image of a property to the platform, RabbitMQ is tasked with scaling it to a user-friendly size.

    The image scaling job is retained in the message queue until the consumer receives it, scales it, and publishes it to the website in the new, more efficient size.

2) Apache Kafka vs RabbitMQ: Architecture

The internal working and the basic architecture can be major factors in deciding between Apache Kafka vs RabbitMQ. Apache Kafka’ Architecture consists of the following components:

Kafka vs RabbitMQ - kafka architecture
Image Source
  • Producer: Messages are published/pushed by producers to a Kafka topic that is generated on a Kafka broker. Furthermore, producers can choose between delivering messages to a broker in an asynchronous or synchronous mode.
  • Kafka broker: Acts as a Kafka server. The messages are stored in the same sequence as they arrive at the broker, and the number of partitions for each message is accordingly configured.
  • ZooKeeper: Serves as a coordinator between the Kafka broker and the consumers. It stores coordination data such as status information, configuration, and location information. To know more, you can check out the Official Apache Kafka Documentation.
  • Mirror Maker: Kafka Replication is one of the most important features because it ensures that messages are published and consumed even if the broker fails for any reason.
  • Consumers: Subscribes to the Kafka topic to receive/pull the messages. Kafka Consumers store messages in ZooKeeper by default. However, Kafka also permits information to be stored in alternative storage systems that are utilized for Online Transaction Processing (OLTP) applications.

To determine the best architecture between Apache Kafka vs RabbitMQ, you can go through the RabbitMQ’s Architecture that is designed using the following elements:

Kafka vs RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ Architecture
Image Source
  • Producer: Creates messages and publishes (sends) them to a broker server. A message has two parts: a payload and a label. The payload is the data the user wants to transmit. The label describes the payload and determines who should receive a copy of the message.
  • Broker: Enables applications to communicate with one other and exchange information.
  • Exchange: Messages delivered to RabbitMQ are received by an exchange, which decides where they should be transmitted.

    Exchanges specify the routing behaviors applied to messages, most commonly by looking at data characteristics that are sent along with the message or included inside the message’s properties.
  • Binding: It instructs an exchange to distribute messages to specific queues. The binding will also direct the exchange to filter which messages it can send to a queue for particular exchange kinds.
  • Queue: It is in charge of storing received messages and may include configuration information that defines what it’s able to do with a message.
  • Consumer: It is attached to a broker server and subscribes to a queue. To know more, you can check out the Official RabbitMQ Documentation.

3) Apache Kafka vs RabbitMQ: Performance

Various factors present in the application determine the performance of the application. Thus, it would be only fair to compare the performance of Apache Kafka vs RabbitMQ based on similar factors present in these applications. 

While compared to RabbitMQ message brokers, Apache Kafka uses Sequential Disk I/O to improve speed when constructing queues. Kafka can handle millions of messages in a single second. RabbitMQ can handle millions of messages per second, but it will need more resources.

While deciding between Apache Kafka vs RabbitMQ, it is to be noted that unlike Kafka, which can keep a large amount of data with minimum overhead, RabbitMQ queues are only quicker when they’re empty.

4) Apache Kafka vs. RabbitMQ: Language

Kafka was first released in 2011 and written in Scala and Java. It is an open-source technology. On the other hand, RabbitMQ is developed in Erlang in 2007. 

5) Apache Kafka vs. RabbitMQ: Push/Pull – Smart/Dumb

Kafka uses a pull mechanism that allows consumers to pull the data from the broker in batches. The consumer smarty keeps an offset tab to the last pulled message encounter. It organizes the data in the order in partitions by using offset. 

RabbitMQ comes with a push design in which the consumer is not aware of any message retrieval. The Broker ensures that the message is delivered to the consumer.

Also, it sends back an acknowledgment after processing the data to ensure that messages are delivered to the consumer. On negative feedback, the message is again sent by putting it in the queue.

6) Apache Kafka vs. RabbitMQ: Scalability and Redundancy

Kafka partitions are essential for providing scalability and redundancy. It replicated the partition to many brokers. So, if in any case one of the brokers fails then another broker can serve the consumer.

If you keep all the partitions in one broker then dependency on the single broker will increase which is risky and chances of failure increase. Also, distributing the partitions will increase the throughput manifolds.

RabbitMQ replicates messages using a queue in a round-robin format. The messages are distributed between queues to increase the throughput and distribute the load. Also, it allows multiple consumers to read messages from multiple queues simultaneously.

7) Apache Kafka vs. RabbitMQ: Message Deletion

Kafka follows a retention period and messages stored based on the retention period are deleted once the period is over. On the other hand, RabbitMQ sends a positive acknowledgment via the consumer to get removed from the queue.

The messages are stored on the consumer on positive ACK and put back into the queue on negative ACK.

8) Apache Kafka vs. RabbitMQ: Message Consumption

Kafka Consumers read a message from the broker and maintain offset to keep the track of queue counter. The offset is incremented on reading the message.

The brokers of RabbitMQ are responsible to deliver a message to the consumer and these messages are sent into batches. 

9) Apache Kafka vs. RabbitMQ: Message Priority

The priority for all messages is the same in Kafka and it cannot be changed.

RabbitMQ allows assigning priority to the messages using a priority queue.

10) Apache Kafka vs. RabbitMQ: Sequential Ordering

Kafka differentiates between messages using topics and Zookeeper maintains the offset so that whenever any consumer requests to read a topic, it will use the offset. 

RabbitMQ maintains orders of the messages in the queue inside the broker.

11) Apache Kafka vs. RabbitMQ: Libraries and Language Support

Kafka supports Ruby, Python, Java, and Node.js.

RabbitMQ supports Elixir, Go, Java, JavaScript, Ruby, C, Swift, Spring, .Net, Python, and PHP.

12) Apache Kafka vs. RabbitMQ: Protocols

Kafka supports Binary Protocol over TCP. While RabbitMQ supports MQTT, AMQP, STOMP, HTTP protocols.

Conclusion

In this article, you have learned about the differences between Apache Kafka vs RabbitMQ in terms of use cases, architecture, and performance. When flexibility is considered, RabbitMQ is more flexible and easier to use than Apache Kafka.

However, when reliability and performance are considered, Apache Kafka outperforms RabbitMQ. Choosing between Apache Kafka vs RabbitMQ has never been easy, and with both technologies improving daily, the margins of advantage have shrunk even further.

For a more comprehensive analysis of your business performance and financial health, it is essential to consolidate from Apache Kafka and all the other applications used across your business.

However, to extract this complex data with everchanging Data Connectors, you would require to invest a section of your Engineering Bandwidth to Integrate, Clean, Transform & Load data to your Data Warehouse or a destination of your choice. On the other hand, a more effortless & economical choice is exploring a Cloud-Based ETL Tool like Hevo Data.

Visit our Website to Explore Hevo

Hevo Data, a No-code Data Pipeline can seamlessly transfer data from a vast sea of sources such as Apache Kafka & Kafka Confluent Cloud to a Data Warehouse or a Destination of your choice to be visualized in a BI Tool. It is a reliable, completely automated, and secure service that doesn’t require you to write any code!  

If you are using Apache Kafka & Kafka Confluent Cloud as your Message Streaming Platform and searching for a Stress-Free Alternative to Manual Data Integration, then Hevo can effortlessly automate this for you. Hevo, with its strong integration with 100+ sources & BI tools(Including 40+ Free Sources), allows you to not only export & load data but also transform & enrich your data & make it analysis-ready in a jiffy.

Want to take Hevo for a ride? Sign Up for a 14-day free trial and simplify your Data Integration process. Do check out the pricing details to understand which plan fulfills all your business needs.

Tell us about your experience of learning about the differences between Apache Kafka vs RabbitMQ! Share your thoughts with us in the comments section below.

No-code Data Pipeline for Apache Kafka