Every business desires to grow, and data is a key component of business growth. Due to this, organizations are placing so much value on data. There are different sources of data, including data generated from the organizational departments as well as data obtained from external sources. In most cases, organizations end up gathering huge volumes of data, running up to petabytes in size. So, where do organizations store such data? They use Data Warehouses. A Data Warehouse can store huge volumes of structured and unstructured data from multiple data sources.
Just like with a regular database, the Schema is very important to a Data Warehouse since it gives a logical description of the data objects. It’s the Schema that describes how different objects in the Data Warehouse are related. Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema is the two types of Data Warehouse Schemas. In this article, you will be learning about the differences between the Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema.
Table of Contents
- What is Star Schema?
- What is Snowflake Schema?
- What is Galaxy Schema?
- What is Star Cluster Schema?
- Comparing Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema
- Which one to choose?
What is Star Schema?
The Star Schema provides the simplest way of organizing data in a Data Warehouse. The centre of the Star Schema can have one or more Fact Tables indexing a series of Dimension Tables. Dimension Tables are used to describe Dimensions; they contain Dimension Keys, Values, and Attributes.
The goal of the Star Schema is to separate the numerical “FACT” data that relates to a business from the descriptive or “DIMENSIONAL” data.
Fact data can include information such as price, speed, weight, and quantities, that is, data presented in a numerical format. Dimensional Data can include uncountable things such as colours, geographical locations, salesperson names, employee names, etc., alongside the numerical information.
The Fact Data is organized inside the Fact Tables, while the Dimensional Data is inside the Dimension Tables. The Fact Tables form the integration points at the centre of a Star in a Star Schema.
More information regarding Star Schema can be found here.
What is Snowflake Schema?
This type of Data Warehouse Schema takes the shape of a Snowflake. The goal of the Snowflake Schema is to normalize the denormalized data of the Star Schema. The Snowflake structure materialized when the dimensions of a Star Schema are detailed and highly structured, having several levels of relationship, and the child tables have multiple parent tables. The Snowflake Schema solves some of the common problems associated with the Star Schema.
You can see the Snowflake Schema as a “multi-dimensional” structure. At the core of a Snowflake Schema is Fact Tables that connect the information contained in the Dimension Tables, which in turn radiate outwards like the Star Schema. However, the Dimension Tables in the Snowflake Schema are divided into more than one table, creating a Snowflake pattern.
The Dimension Tables are turned into more than one table until they are completely normalized.
More information regarding Snowflake Schema can be found here.
Simplify your Data Analysis with Hevo’s No-code Data Pipelines
Hevo Data, a No-code Data Pipeline helps to transfer data from 100+ sources to a Data Warehouse/Destination of your choice to visualize it in your desired BI tool. Hevo is fully-managed and completely automates the process of not only loading data from your desired source but also enriching the data and transforming it into an analysis-ready form without having to write a single line of code. Its fault-tolerant architecture ensures that the data is handled in a secure, consistent manner with zero data loss.
It provides a consistent & reliable solution to manage data in real-time and always have analysis-ready data in your desired destination. It allows you to focus on key business needs and perform insightful analysis using a BI tool of your choice.Get Started with Hevo for Free
Check out what makes Hevo amazing:
- Secure: Hevo has a fault-tolerant architecture that ensures that the data is handled in a secure, consistent manner with zero data loss.
- Schema Management: Hevo takes away the tedious task of schema management & automatically detects schema of incoming data and maps it to the destination schema.
- Minimal Learning: Hevo, with its simple and interactive UI, is extremely simple for new customers to work on and perform operations.
- Hevo Is Built To Scale: As the number of sources and the volume of your data grows, Hevo scales horizontally, handling millions of records per minute with very little latency.
- Incremental Data Load: Hevo allows the transfer of data that has been modified in real-time. This ensures efficient utilization of bandwidth on both ends.
- Live Support: The Hevo team is available round the clock to extend exceptional support to its customers through chat, email, and support calls.
- Live Monitoring: Hevo allows you to monitor the data flow and check where your data is at a particular point in time.
What is Galaxy Schema?
A Galaxy Schema is made up of two Fact Tables that share dimension tables. Fact Constellation Schema is another name for it. The Galaxy Schema is named for the way the schema is regarded as a collection of stars.
There are two facts tables as you can see in the sample above.
Conformed Dimensions are shared dimensions in the Galaxy schema.
What is Star Cluster Schema?
The hierarchies in the Snowflake Schema are fully enlarged. However, this increases the Schema’s complexity and necessitates more joins. Star schema, on the other hand, comprises totally collapsed hierarchies, which may result in redundancy. As a result, the optimum approach may be a Star Cluster Schema design that strikes a balance between these two schemas.
In hierarchies, overlapping dimensions can be found as forks. When an entity operates as a parent in two different dimensional hierarchies, a fork occurs. The classification of fork entities with one-to-many relationships was then identified.
Comparing Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema
The following chart summarizes the differences between the Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema by comparing the Star and Snowflake Schema across numerous factors:
- Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema: Normalization
- Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema: Data Redundancy
- Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema: Query Complexity
- Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema: Data Integrity
- Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema: Query Performance
Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema: Normalization
The Star Schema dimensions are denormalized in that it has the same values repeated multiple times in the same table. On the other hand, Snowflake Schema has a fully normalized data structure. The dimensional hierarchies are stored in separate dimensional tables.
Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema: Data Redundancy
The Star Schema stores redundant data in dimension tables whereas the Snowflake Schema avoids data redundancy by storing fully normalized data in dimension tables.
Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema: Query Complexity
In Star Schema tables are joined to only one-level dimensional tables and users do not need to write multiple joins.
Whereas, Snowflake Schema needs a complex query design this is due to complex relationships between the fact table and its dimensional table. This requires more joins to link the additional tables.
Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema: Data Integrity
As Star Schema stores data redundantly than data integrity is more of a serious problem in Star Schema rather than in Snowflake Schema. Multiple copies of data exist in the Star Schema dimensional tables. Whereas, Snowflake Schema is less vulnerable to data integrity issues as it normalizes the data before storing it into dimensional tables.
Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema: Query Performance
Star Schema has a faster query time than Snowflake Schema because they need a single join between the fact table and its other attributes in dimensional tables.
Snowflake Schema needs complex joins to dimensional tables with their own sub-dimensional tables to execute a query which slows down the performance.
|Star Schema||Snowflake Schema|
|The Star Schema contains the Fact Tables and the Dimension Tables.||The Snowflake Schema contains the Fact Tables, Dimension Tables, and the Sub-Dimension Tables.|
|It is a top-down model.||It is a bottom-up model.|
|Queries execute faster in the Star Schema. This is achieved using the Star Join Query Optimization technique. Tables can be connected with Multiple Dimensions.||Execution of queries takes a longer time in the Snowflake Schema than in the Star Schema. The centralized Fact Table in the Snowflake Schema is less likely connected with Multiple Dimensions. The longer execution time is also caused by the many number of foreign keys.|
|There is no normalization in the Star Schema.||In the Snowflake Schema, there is both normalization and denormalization.|
|It has a very simple design.||This Schema has a complex design because of the Sub-Dimension Tables.|
|The Star Schema has a low query complexity.||The query complexity of the Snowflake Schema is higher than that of the Star Schema.|
|It’s easy to understand the Star Schema.||It’s difficult to understand the Snowflake Schema.|
|It only has a few number of foreign keys.||It has a high number of foreign keys.|
|The Star Schema has a high data redundancy, which makes it a bit difficult to maintain and change.||The Snowflake Schema has a low data redundancy, which makes it easier to maintain and change.|
|The hierarchies for the Dimensions are kept in the Dimensional Table.||The hierarchies for the Dimensions are divided into separate tables.|
|In the Star Schema, only a single join creates the relationship between the Fact Table and the Dimension Tables.||In the Snowflake Schema, many joins are needed to fetch the data.|
|It has a simple database design.||It has a complex database design.|
|Faster cube processing.||Cube processing may be slow due to the complex join.|
|It is suitable for data marts that have simple relationships (1:1 or 1:many).||Suitable for use in the Data Warehouse core for simplifying complex relationships (many:many).|
|Should be used when the Dimension Table has less number of rows.||Should be used when the Dimension Table has a relatively big size because it reduces space.|
Now, It is important to understand the limitations of Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema which are as follows:
Limitations of Star Schema
Since you have understood the main differences between Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema, you can move on to the limitations of these structures. The following are the challenges of using the Star Schema:
- Decreased Data Integrity: It’s difficult to impose data integrity effectively in the Star Schema due to its denormalized data structure.
- Difficulty Handling Diverse and Complex Queries: The Star Schema can only work well with a narrow set of simple queries due to its denormalized data structure.
- Doesn’t Support Many-to-Many Relationships: The Star Schema has a simple Dimension Schema, hence, it can’t handle “many-to-many data relationships” effectively. Thus in the discussion of Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema, Star Schema will loose out when dealing with any-to-many relationships.
Limitations of the Snowflake Schema
The following are the challenges of using the Snowflake Schema:
- Complex Data Schemas: The Snowflake Schema generates many levels of complexity as it normalizes the attributes of the Star Schema. This is a major diference between Star and SnowflakeSchema results and it causes complicated source query JOINS.
- Slower Cube Data Processing: This is a result of the complex joins, hence, the Star Schema appears as the better option when deciding between Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema (as far as cube data processing is concerned).
- Lower Data Integrity: Even after normalization, Snowflake Schemas cannot provide the level of data integrity that is provided by the traditional, highly-normalized database structures.
That’s it! You now have a strong understanding of the differences between Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema.
Which one to choose?
Star Schemas, on the one hand, are simpler, run queries faster, and are simpler to set up.
Snowflake Schemas, on the other hand, are less prone to Data Integrity problems, are easier to manage, and take up less space.
It depends on which advantage (or disadvantage) best matches your business use cases, based on the tradeoffs listed above.
Thi article introduced you to the Star Schema vs Snowflake Schemas. It also discussed the storage structure of Star Schema vs Snowflake Schemas in-depth. You’ve learned the differences between the Star Schema vs Snowflake Schemas based on multiple criteria. Moreover, you’ve learned about the limitations of opting for either of the Star Schema vs Snowflake Schemas.Visit our Website to Explore Hevo
Now since you have understood the difference between Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema, you may want to implement them. However, integrating and analyzing data from a huge set of diverse sources can be challenging, this is where Hevo comes into the picture. Hevo Data, a No-code Data Pipeline helps you transfer data from a source of your choice in a fully-automated and secure manner without having to write the code repeatedly. Hevo with its strong integration with 100+ sources & BI tools, allows you to not only export & load data but also transform & enrich your data & make it analysis-ready in a jiffy.
Want to take Hevo for a spin? Sign Up for a 14-day free trial and experience the feature-rich Hevo suite first hand.
Share your understanding of the comparison between Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema in the comments section below!